Mempersiapkan Society 5.0 melalui Pembelajaran Fisika

Joko Siswanto

Abstract


Society 5.0 merupakan masyarakat berpusat pada manusia dengan dukungan sistem
yang mengintegrasikan dunia maya dengan dunia nyata untuk menghapus
kesenjangan antar manusia. Perkembangan teknologi yang pesat harus diorientasikan
pada penyelesaian masalah sosial dan mencegah timbulnya masalah sosial yang baru
akibat penggunaan teknologi. Pendidik fisika berperan dalam penyiapan itu, melalui
pembelajaran yang diorientasikan pada penguasaan konten fisika dan keterampilan
abad 21. Alternatif pembelajaran yang dapat digunakan oleh pendidik fisika adalah
pembelajaran STEM dan IBMR. Selain itu, smart classroom juga sangat potensial
untuk dikembangkan dalam rangka mempersiapkan society 5.0.

Keywords


Society 5.0, pembelajaran fisika, pendidik, keterampilan abad 21, pembelajaran STEM, IBMR, smart classroom

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bligh, A. (2015). Towards a 10-year plan for science, technology, engineering and

mathematics (STEM) education and skills in Queensland, Queensland:

Department of Education, Training and the Arts.

Bryndin, E. (2018). System Synergetic Formation of Society 5.0 for Development of Vital

Spaces on Basis of Ecological Economic and Social Programs, Annals of Ecology

and Environmental Science, 2, 12–19.

Bybee, R. W. (2013) The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities,

Arlington- Virginia: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Cohen, L.N.M, & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation and creativity: Runco MA and

Pritzker, SR (Ed) Encyclopedia of creativity, Sandiego: Academic Press.

Ferreira, C.M, & Serpa, S. (2018). Society 5.0 and social development: contributions to

a discussion. Management and Organizational Studies, 5, 26–31

Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning for structured teachers: A framework for the

gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria VA: ASCD.

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society. Japan

Spotlight Special Article 2. https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/

Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who will be the members of society 5.0? Towards an

anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies. Socai Science,

(5), 148.

Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., & Zuhlke, D. (2014). Human-Machine-Interaction

in the Industry 4.0 Era. Paper present at 2014 12th IEEE International Conference

on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto Alegre, Brazil, July 27–30, New York:

IEEE, 89–94

Government of Japan. (2016). Outline of the Fifth Science and Technology Basic Plan.

Provisional Translation. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/

basic/5thbasicplan_outline.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2019).

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and

Authentic Learning. Corwin: Sage.

Hannover, R. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches

in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, Washington DC: National

Academies Press.

Indrawati, S. M. (2019). Sumber daya manusia kompetitif menuju era 5.0. Orasi ilmiah

Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Dies Natalis ke-38 Universitas PGRI

Semarang, 23 Juli 2019.

Kang, J. (2018). Change: From Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0—Taking the Comparison of

Related Development Strategies Between Germany and Japan as an Example.

Paper present at 2018 4th International Conference on Humanities and Social

Science Research (ICHSSR 2018), Wuxi, China, April 25–27. Edited by Xuemei

Du, Chunyan Huang and Yulin Zhong. Paris: Atlantis Press, 569–73.

Keidanren (Japan Business Federation). (2016). Toward realization of the new economy

and society. Reform of the economy and society by the deepening of “Society

0”. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/029_ outline.pdf

Kelley, T.R. & Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM

Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11.

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, HG., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0.

Business & Information Systems Engineering 6, 239-42.

Mariyana, R., Nugraha, A., & Rachmawati, Y. (2013). Pengelolaan lingkungan belajar.

Jakarta: Kencana Media Group

Medina-Borja, A. (2017). Smart Human-Centered Service Systems of the Future. In

Future Services & Societal Systems in Society 5.0. Edited by Kazuo Iwano,

Yasunori Kimura, Yosuke Takashima, Satoru Bannai, and Naohumi Yamada.

Tokyo: Center for Research and Development Strategy, Japan Science and

Technology Agency, 235–39.

Saavedra, A. & Opfer, V. (2012). Teaching and Learning 21st Century Skills: Lessons

from the Learning Sciences. A Global Cities Education Network Report. New

York, Asia Society.

Siswanto, J. (2018). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Pendekatan STEM untuk

Meningkatkan Kreativitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran

Fisika,9(2), 133-137.

Siswanto J, Susantini E & Jatmiko B 2018 Practicality and effectiveness of the IBMR

teaching model to improve physics problem solving skills Journal of Baltic

Science Education (JBSE) 17(3).

Wagner, T. (2010). Overcoming The Global Achievement Gap (online). Cambridge,

Mass., Harvard University.

Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui

pembelajaran, seminar nasional Pendidikan dengan tema “Isu-isu Strategis


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.